Dosarul Revolutiei. The Past is Coming (75). Declaratia Maiorului Radu Ioan (06.02.1990): “…discutia ulterioara incetarii focului avuta cu lt. maj. Bancila [UM 0391 Brasov, Securitate], aflat in unul din cele doua ABI-uri, pe care l-am intrebat, ,Cum de nu ati tras si dvs, cind ati fost atacati?’, la care mi-a raspuns ca si-a dat seama imediat ca o unitate de foc atit de puternica nu ar fi putut fi declansata de elementele teroriste….”

If the terrorists did not exist in December 1989–and were not drawn from the Securitate and fighting as part of the counterrevolution in defense of Nicolae Ceausescu–as the military prosecutors and so much public opinion in Romania maintain, how is it possible that while the gunfire was going on that Securitate officials told others that the tactics and characteristics of one side–the terrorists–differed from that of those fighting on the side of the Revolution?

See for example:

Cpt. Gh. Bobric (la Tirgoviste): “Totodata eu cred ca [seful Securitatii locale, Col.] Dinu nu era strain de actiunile desfasurate impotriva unitatii. De pilda, intr-o noapte, m-a scos afara, in curtea unitatii, si auzind in oras zgomote, imi spunea, ‘Fii atent, astea sunt ABI-uri…In 10 minute, incep sa traga…’ Stia totul, de parca isi confirma un plan cunoscut dinainte. Si mi-a mai spus, ‘Teroristii si antiteroristii sunt pregatiti dupa aceleasi principii si reguli, fac aceeasi instructie.’” (Viorel Domenico, Ceausescu la Targoviste: 22-25 decembrie 1989, p. 157)

or
Declaratie, Cazacu Alina Doina, 01.05.1993: zona Televiziunii (Bucuresti), 23-24 decembrie 1989…: “[Marian] Romanescu [USLA] imi explica deosebirea dupa sunet ale gloantelor trase de forte MApN si alte forte inclusiv cele trase de lunetisti.”

https://rolandothomassonphd.home.blog/2022/03/19/dosarul-revolutiei-the-past-is-coming-42-declaratie-cazacu-alina-doina-01-05-1993-zona-televiziunii-23-24-decembrie-1989-marian-romanescu-usla-imi-explica-deosebirea-dupa-sunet-ale-glo/

and now, back to Brasov, and a separate declaration from Maior Radu Ioan about what Lt. Col. Bancila Mircea [UM 0391 Brasov, Securitate] told him:

Brasov vol. 9

Desigur, mai tarziu, de exemplu in declaratia lui Lt. Col. Bancila Mircea de 15.06.2001, spune: “[c]onsider, ca ofiter de lupta impotriva terorismului,…ca tot ceea ce s-a intimplat [in Brasov, 22-27.12.89] a fost urmarea unor actiuni neprofesioniste” [p. 265]

but during the upheaval in December 1989, Bancila told Mr. Radu Ioan something quite different. How did Securitate Lt. Col. Bancila Mirecea know there was a difference in the character of the gunfire between “the terrorist elements” and those supporting the Revolution, if the terrorists did not exist and he did not know who they were?

p. 347
“…discutia ulterioara incetarii focului avuta cu lt. maj. Bancila [UM 0391 Brasov, Securitate], aflat in unul din cele doua ABI-uri, pe care l-am intrebat, ,Cum de nu ati tras si dvs, cind ati fost atacati?’, la care mi-a raspuns ca si-a dat seama imediat ca o unitate de foc atit de puternica nu ar fi putut fi declansata de elementele teroriste si ca sint victimele confuzii de moment….”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s